| SPECIAL NOTICES |
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NAIS ON HORSEOWNERS:
IF YOU THINK NAIS WON'T AFFECT YOU CAUSE YOU ONLY HAVE ONE OR TWO HORSES? THINK AGAIN.
#####################################################################
Economic Impact of NAIS for Horse Owners
Karen Nowak © February 2009
Every horse owner knows that the current economic situation in the USA is impacting the horse industry. Feed costs are higher than they’ve ever been. In fact, any and all supplies/services used for our horses – from supplements to tack to farrier and vet costs are higher. At the same time, sales are way down. Horses are on the market for longer periods of time before they do sell and prices are rock bottom. Those of us who breed cut way back on the number of mares bred last year. Some, like me, chose not to risk it at all and bred NO mares last year. We are feeding and caring for broodmares and stallions with no return whatsoever on our significant investment.
And now we have NAIS looming on the not too distant horizon!
But wait, you say, “I thought NAIS was now voluntary!”
Remember the key phrase “voluntary at the Federal level.” Three states so far have made all or part of NAIS mandatory. Tremendous pressure in terms of grant monies is being placed on State Departments of Agriculture by the USDA.
In addition, if you read the USDA’s most recent official document, the September 2008, A Business Plan To Advance Animal Disease Traceability, you will discover that while they claim NAIS is “voluntary,” the handwriting is on the wall. One way or another, they will push NAIS through.
What will those costs be? Up to this point, all we have been told by the USDA is, “There will be a cost to producers.” They then try to divert our attention by exclaiming that the first component of NAIS - premises registration - is free. Yes, it IS free – for now at least.
But technically it really isn’t free because the entire premises registration system has been funded by the taxpayers of this country without any of us having a vote in how that $130 million of our hard-earned dollars has been spent.
The question we should be asking is “Will it remain free, or will we have to pay to renew it every year once the funding dries up?” Ask and watch how quickly they divert the question!
NAIS is a massive system! According to the 2007 Census of Agriculture, there are 2.2 million farms plus an unknown number of properties which house small numbers of livestock for personal use, show grounds, auction/sales barns, vet clinics, stallion stations, and public and privately-owned trail systems.
Virtually any location animals from different
properties “commingle’” will need to register their premises if the
NAIS system is to be fully compliant and functioning as designed.
The
second component of NAIS is animal identification with radio-frequency
ID tags or implantable microchips containing a unique 15-digit ID
number. According to the USDA, farms in the USA have an inventory of 2.3 billion livestock encompassing 33 species at any point in time.
What will the cost of this electronic identification be? The USDA has thus far refused to answer honestly. In the 2006 NAIS User Guide, the USDA claimed microchips for horses would cost $8. They continued to skirt around the true cost by stating “Currently, such cost for implanting the transponder in horses is approximately $15 to $20 per horse and is also dependent on variation in travel cost of the veterinarian to the premises.”
NONE of this is accurate! USDA has stated that those farms that move animals as a “production unit” will NOT need individual ID. They may use a group/lot number because the animals all move together and do not commingle with other animals. Those who will benefit by this group/lot number are the massive corporate-owned agribusinesses, not the owners of a few animals. It is no accident that these same agribusinesses, whose expenses with this system will be less, are those who helped design the NAIS program in the first place!
The third component is animal tracking. Every time a horse leaves your property and commingles’ with horses from other premises, a movement report will have to be filed in this massive NAIS database. The purpose is to be able to trace animals within 48 hours in the event of a disease outbreak. It is important to remember that this is an “after the fact” response. NAIS in NO way prevents disease! What will the charges be for entering these reports? The USDA has refused to say anything other than “there will be costs.”
The other cost for the tracking component is the need to purchase a scanner to read these microchips. The USDA skirts around this issue as well by saying they do not require owners to purchase one. The USDA might not but several states already require you to carry a scanner in the trailer if your horse is microchipped. For those with a single horse, you may be able to get away with not buying a scanner, but if you own several horses, the risk of a “transcription error” with those 15-digit ID numbers is so great that you have to ask yourself if it is worth the risk of the penalty fee. There are `cheap’ $300 scanners out there, but they do NOT have a computer interface so you are back to the considerable risk of transcription errors.
In July of 2007, after much public outcry, the USDA funded a cost-benefit analysis by Dhuyvetter and Blasi at Kansas State University. That study was completed in July of 2008. The USDA has yet to release the findings of this study. Several Freedom of Information Act formal requests have been made to obtain the results of this study. Thus far all requests have been denied. So much for “transparency in government”!
In an effort to determine what the costs would be for horse owners, I used the cost estimate analysis form for cattle, designed by Kansas State University’s Agricultural Economist Kevin C. Dhuyvetter, Ph.D. and Beef Specialist Dale Blasi, Ph.D., and changed the tags and scanner to those microchips and the scanner designed for horses.
| RFID (Radio Frequency ID/microchips) Components Horses | |||||||
| Useful Life | Salvage | *Annual | Percent | **Yearly | |||
| Interest 7.5% | Initial cost | Yrs | Value, $ | Cost | to RFID | RFID Cost | |
| eID Transponder - Vet Fees | |||||||
| microchip PER HORSE | $30 | 30 | 0 | 100% | |||
| implantation PER HORSE | $25 | 0 | 100% | ||||
| sedation PER HORSE | $20 | 0 | 100% | ||||
| farm call | $55 | 0 | 100% | ||||
| Electronic Reader | |||||||
| Scanner with computer interface | $1,025 | 3 | 0 | $367 | 100% | $367 | |
| spare battery | $45 | 3 | 0 | $16 | 100% | $16 | |
| Data Accumulator | |||||||
| Laptop Computer | $1,000 | 3 | $200 | $287 | 60% | $172 | |
| spare battery | $150 | 3 | 0 | $54 | 100% | $54 | |
| external backup device | $100 | 3 | 0 | $35 | 100% | $35 | |
| Software/web based analysis & storage | |||||||
| Computer Software | $700 | 5 | 0 | $173 | 100% | $173 | |
| anti-viral software | $45 | 1 | 0 | $29 | 60% | $29 | |
| Other | |||||||
| Internet Access | $480 | 1 | 0 | $498 | 25% | $125 | |
| Subscriptions/ Upgrade Fees | $100 | 1 | 0 | $104 | 100% | $104 | |
| Labor | $500 | 0 | $519 | 100% | $519 | ||
| Total Annual Cost | $4,275 | $1,594 | |||||
| * includes annual interest + divided over number of useful years ** based on % to RFID | |||||||
Contact your veterinarian for the cost of microchipping, as the above information is an average. It has been included for people to use as a guideline only. Simply
multiply those costs by the number of horses you own/lease and add it
to the Yearly RFID Cost column to estimate your first year expenses
under NAIS.
If you board your horse, expect your board to rise to help cover the considerable cost not only in equipment but in labor with all the scanning that will need to be done every time you take your horse to a show, etc. Spare batteries and anti-viral software were not included in the cost estimate analysis by Dhuyvetter and Blasi. They are included here because they ARE necessities!
There is no movement cost listed above, just as there was not on the original by Dhuyvetter and Blasi. An assumption has been made that the `computer software’ is NAIS compliant software and the `subscription/ upgrade fees’ allow the owner to upload the data themselves. That would be far more cost-effective for everyone (including the USDA) in the long run.
What will the costs be for show organizations? They will need at least one scanner and spare battery, a laptop computer with spare battery and external back-up device (prevent risk of lost data!), internet access and all the software, subscriptions listed above plus the labor to perform all these tasks. Scanning horses at shows will be a logistical nightmare because of the many variables from one venue to the next, the type and size of classes, etc. It would be impossible to scan all horses in the trailer as they enter the show grounds unless you want a major traffic jam! There is also the not unlikely possibility that the person scanning could be injured if the horse spooked in the confined space of a horse trailer.
Last is the risk of `missing’ some scans due to late arrivals that will not be showing until the end of the day. It would also be impossible to scan each horse as it enters the show ring because of the delay it would cause in each class as well as the considerable risk of `duplicate entries’ since most show in more than one class. The most logical solution to these logistic difficulties is to set up scanning stations on the showgrounds. Horses could be scanned and their entry numbers stamped with a symbol easily recognized by staff at the in-gate to each show ring.
How much time will this take? A very conservative estimate is 3 minutes per horse. We cannot line them up nose to tail like they do cattle – a fact that I do not think the USDA has considered. There will have to be enough space between horses to prevent humans and horses from being kicked. That means additional time spent waiting for the next horse to move up in line. While the microchip should be placed in the same general location, time will occasionally be lost searching for a microchip that is not quite in the perfect location. Last will be the horses that spook at the scanner. We all know some will, and that will cost more time!
Just how much time will scanning take at an average horse show? Estimate that one person can scan 20 horses per hour IF all goes well. It is not unusual for there to be 200 horses at a popular local or regional show and that is where we must focus to determine the true cost to us as horse owners.
If only one person scanned, it would take 10 hours just to scan all these horses into the NAIS database! Five scanning stations would be far more workable as that would take a total of 2 hours to scan in every horse. But wait – that means 5 scanners and 5 spare batteries! The cost to the show organizer just jumped from $1070 to $5350! Divide that over the 3 year life of the scanner and it comes to $1783 per year just for scanners. In addition, they will need 4 additional people just to scan and we all know how difficult it is to recruit enough help at shows! Just as with boarding, these costs will have to passed on to those of us who show.
The cost per horse to cover this expense (broken
down over the 3 year lifespan of the equipment) would be an additional
$14 in entry fees. If they try to recoup their costs that first year, the additional fee would be $42. That’s not too bad you are probably saying to yourself. Very
true if you are the person showing but what about the show organizer
who is already struggling to meet expenses in this economic climate? They have to pay out an additional $8,090 for that first year for all this equipment plus labor for the additional staff. Will they be able to survive? My
belief is we will see more shows canceled, just as the recent Red Hills
Horse Trials in Florida was forced to cancel because there weren’t
enough entries to meet expenses. Imagine if they have this expense on top of it!
What
impact will NAIS have on the much smaller shows? One way to attract
new people and children into showing, and generate income in training
and/or sale of horses, is to offer small shows at low prices to allow
them to “get their feet wet.” These shows typically have 20 or so
horses with entry fees of $4 to $7 per class. Twenty horses is just
enough that you dare not have a “cheap” scanner (no computer interface)
because of that ever present risk of `transcription errors’ when
copying down numbers manually.
These show organizers will be faced with the same costs as the bigger shows with the exception that they will only require one scanner and one spare battery. Their initial cost outlay to comply with NAIS will be $3,645. Will their budget allow it? Probably not but IF it did, the cost per horse to cover this expense (broken down over the 3 year lifespan of the equipment) would be an additional $59 in entry fees. If they try to recoup their costs that first year, the additional fee would be $177! There is no conceivable way these smaller shows could continue to operate!
Who loses in the end? The entire horse industry loses because these are tomorrow’s stars, as well as potential clients for the many services the horse industry offers. The lost exhibitors are our future breeders and/or trainers!
What penalties might we incur under NAIS? The USDA avoids this question but both the USDA and Congress state that US Codes Title 7 Agriculture, Chapter 109, ( the Animal Health Protection Act) authorizes NAIS. Below is the exact wording for penalties under this chapter:§ 8313.
Penalties
(a) Criminal penalties
(1) Offenses
(A) In general A person that knowingly violates this chapter, or knowingly forges, counterfeits, or, without
authority from the Secretary, uses, alters, defaces, or destroys any
certificate, permit, or other document provided for in this chapter
shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
(B) Distribution or sale A person that knowingly imports, enters,
exports, or moves any animal or article, for distribution or sale, in
violation of this chapter, shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned
not more than 5 years, or both.
(2) Multiple violations On the second and any subsequent conviction of
a person of a violation of this chapter under paragraph (1), the person
shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or
both. (b) Civil penalties
(1) In general Except as provided in section 8309 (d) (Veterinary
Accreditation Program) of this title, any person that violates this
chapter, or that forges, counterfeits, or, without authority from the
Secretary, uses, alters, defaces, or destroys any certificate, permit,
or other document provided under this chapter may, after notice and
opportunity for a hearing on the record, be assessed a civil penalty by
the Secretary that does not exceed the greater of—
(A) (i) $50,000 in the case of any individual, except that the civil
penalty may not exceed $1,000 in the case of an initial violation of
this chapter by an individual moving regulated articles not for
monetary gain;
(ii) $250,000 in the case of any other person for each violation; and
(iii) $500,000 for all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding; or
(B) twice the gross gain or gross loss for any violation or forgery,
counterfeiting, or unauthorized use, alteration, defacing or
destruction of a certificate, permit, or other document provided under
this chapter that results in the person’s deriving pecuniary gain or
causing pecuniary loss to another person.
We, as horse owners, must stand up and say NO to NAIS! For more information on how to get involved, please go to http://farmandranch freedom.org, http://libertyark. net, http://naisinfocent ral.net, http://nonais. org and http://naisstinks. com. There is an excellent short video on the LibertyArk website: http://libertyark. net/NAIS- new/NAIS% 20Clip/ and another at: http://sovereignty. net/library/ NAIS-web. htm The latter is a bit outdated but still well worth watching.To download the USDA’s most recent document: A Business Plan To Advance Animal Disease Traceability, go to: http://animalid. aphis.usda. gov/nais/ naislibrary/ documents/ plans_reports/ TraceabilityBusi nessPlan% 20Ver%201. 0%20Sept% 202008.pdf
-----------------------------------------------------------------------Yahoo News on NAIS:
http://news.search.yahoo.com/news/search?p=NAIS&c=
Google News on NAIS:
http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&q=NAIS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10-08: The Battle Goes On: http://www.nonais.org
1-20-2008: Some informative videos to watch concerning our general state of "the union" as well as the reasoning behind NAIS:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URGENT ALERT!!!!
10-23-07
URGENT ALERT: Call the Senate Agriculture Committee IMMEDIATELY. The Senate
Agriculture Committee has just released the draft language of the Farm Bill,
which will be discussed by the Committee tomorrow. The bad news is that the
Livestock Title includes NAIS! Senator Harkin has included a provision that
defines NAIS and addresses confidentiality of the information collected under
it. This section implies approval of the USDA's program, without addressing the
many problems with NAIS, including the USDA's misleading and coercive
tactics.
TAKE ACTION: Call the Senators listed below. Ask to speak to the
staffer who handles agricultural issues, not just the front
desk!
MESSAGE: I want section 10305 taken out of the Farm Bill. I do not
want NAIS included in the Farm Bill in any manner at all. While we appreciate
Senator Harkin trying to protect people's privacy, the provision does more harm
than good. The Senate should not imply approval for any form of federally
planned or funded NAIS.
KEY CONTACTS:
Senator Tom Harkin, Chairman
of Agriculture Committee, (D-IA) 202-224-3254 Senator Saxby Chambliss, Ranking
Member (R-GA) 202-224-3521 Your Senators: Go to www.senate.gov/
ADDITIONAL CONTACTS:
Calls to other members of the
Agriculture Committee are most effective when they come from people within the
state the Senator represents. But, as Committee members, they are supposed to
take input from anyone. If you have extra time after calling your Senators,
Senator Harkin, and Senator Chambliss, call the other members, listed below. And
pass this on to your friends and relatives in those states!
Other Members
of the Committee:
Patrick Leahy (D-VT) 202-224-4242
Kent Conrad (D-ND)
202-224-2043
Max Baucus (D-MT) 202-224-2651
Blanch Lincoln (D-AR)
202-224-4843
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) 202-224-4822
Ben Nelson (D-NE)
202-224-6551
Ken Salazar (D-CO) 202-224-5852
Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
202-224-2315
Robert Casey (D-PA) 202-224-6324
Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
202-224-3244
Richard Lugar (R-IN) 202-224-4814
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
202-224-5054
Mitch McConnell (R-KY) 202-224-2541
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
202-224-4774
Lindsey Graham (R-SC) 202-224-5972
Norm Coleman (R-MN)
202-224-5641
Mike Crapo (R-ID) 202-224-6142
John Thune (R-SD)
202-224-2321
Charles Grassley (R-IA) 202-224-3744
MORE
INFORMATION
Section 10305 of the draft Farm Bill provides:
Sec.
10305: Protection of Information in the Animal Identification System: The Animal
Health Protection Act (7 USC 8301 et seq.) is amended … by inserting … the
following:
(a) Definition of National Animal Identification System – In
this section, the term "national animal identification system" means a system
for identifying or tracing animals that is established by the Secretary,
(b)
Protection from Disclosure ….
For the full provision, go to http://agriculture.
TALKING POINTS
Please do not put any
provision for NAIS in the Farm Bill. It is not right to insert a section to
address confidentiality of information collected under NAIS, without addressing
the myriad abuses that USDA has committed under the program.
NAIS will
hurt our economy:
* There still is no cost-benefit analysis of NAIS. USDA
has only recently requested one from Kansas State University. The study is
unlikely to be a thorough or unbiased study, given that Kansas State has just
established a federally-funded Animal Identification Center.
* Costs of the
program include the cost of the tags, hardware, software, time and labor
*
Many small farmer and ranchers cannot afford these costs
* Service providers
(veterinarians, feed stores, auction houses, meat processors, etc.) will be
harmed when the farmers and ranchers go out of business.
Remaining
farmers will pass the costs on to consumers, adding to inflation
The USDA
has provided no scientific proof to show that NAIS will improve disease
control:
* It does not address the cause, treatment, or transmission of
disease, in domestic or wild animals.
* It does not significantly improve on
current methods for identification and tracking of disease.
NAIS is not
necessary for the market. Age- and source-verification is already available
through the USDA's Process Verified Program
NAIS will not improve food
safety:
* USDA itself has stated that this is not a food safety program
*
Contamination of food with e. coli and other bacteria occurs at the
slaughterhouse or afterwards, while NAIS will stop before that
point.
NAIS will not protect against terrorism:
* The microchips
chosen by the state can be cloned, destroyed, or infected with computer viruses,
and reprogrammed. Any terrorist or thief can use this.
* The database of
information, created by the state agency and available to USDA, will provide a
target for hackers.
NAIS infringes on people's constitutional rights,
including due process, privacy, and religious freedom.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NO-NAIS
EVENT CALENDAR FOR MASSACHUSETTS CLICK HERE
The words of Ben Franklin are timeless;
“Any person who is willing to sacrifice liberty for safety
deserves neither liberty nor safety”.
7-12-06:
YOU
ARE NEEDED!
Coming up on the 19th of
this month there will be a Hearing at the State House in Boston
starting at 10:30 am.
WE
NEED YOU THERE!!
Join
us at the State House's Great Hall for a Legislative Day about NAIS:
Hearing w/legislators
Face to face visits with area legislators.
(If you'd like to speak, please contact Pat Stewart at 978-827-1305)
Can't make it to Boston? CALL,
FAX OR EMAIL your Senator and Representative.
Tell them that the NAIS ISN'T NECESSARY! Let them knowhow much yu value
our rural lifestyle, freedom of choice and privacy. Most of all, let
them know that this program is noticed and
NOT
WANTED!
6-12-06:
Stop the National Animal ID System
Congressman Ron Paul, May 29, 2006
The House of Representatives recently passed funding for a new federal mandate that threatens to put thousands of small farmers and ranchers out of business. The National Animal Identification System, known as NAIS, is an expensive and unnecessary federal program that requires owners of livestock-- cattle, dairy, poultry, and even horses-- to tag animals with electronic tracking devices. The intrusive monitoring system amounts to nothing more than a tax on livestock owners, allowing the federal government access to detailed information about their private property.
In typical Washington-speak, NAIS is "voluntary"--provided USDA bureaucrats are satisfied with the level of cooperation. Trust me, NAIS will be mandatory within a few years. When was the last time a new federal program did not expand once implemented?
As usual, Congress is spending millions of dollars creating a complex non-solution to a very simple problem. NAIS will cost taxpayers at least $33 million for starters.
Agribusiness giants support NAIS, because they want the federal government to create a livestock database and provide free industry data. But small and independent livestock owners face a costly mandate if NAIS becomes law.
Larger livestock operations will be able to tag whole groups of animals with one ID device. Smaller ranchers and farmers, however, will be forced to tag each individual animal, at a cost of anywhere from $3 to $20 per head. And NAIS applies to anyone with a single horse, pig, chicken, or goat in the backyard--no exceptions. NAIS applies to children in 4-H or FFA. Once NAIS becomes mandatory, any failure to report and tag an animal subjects the owner to $1,000 per day fines.
NAIS also forces livestock owners to comply with new paperwork and monitoring regulations. These farmers and ranchers literally will be paying for an assault on their property and privacy rights, as NAIS empowers federal agents to enter and seize property without a warrant-- a blatant violation of the 4th amendment.
NAIS is not about preventing mad cow or other diseases. States already have animal identification systems in place, and virtually all stockyards issue health certificates. Since most contamination happens after animals have been sold, tracing them back to the farm or ranch that sold them won’t help find the sources of disease.
More than anything, NAIS places our family farmers and ranchers at an economic disadvantage against agribusiness and overseas competition. As dairy farmer and rancher Bob Parker stated, NAIS is "too intrusive, too costly, and will be devastating to small farmers and ranchers."
NAIS means more government, more regulations, more fees, more federal spending, less privacy, and diminished property rights. It’s exactly the kind of federal program every conservative, civil libertarian, animal lover, businessman, farmer, and rancher should oppose. The House has already acted, but there’s still time to tell the Senate to dump NAIS. Please call your Senators and tell them you oppose spending even one dime on the NAIS program in the 2007 agriculture appropriations bill.
Congressman Ron Paul, a Republican, represents the 14th Congressional District of Texas, which encompasses the Gulf Coast region south and west of Houston.
1. NAIS will be too costly and burdensome for farmers and ranchers.
2. NAIS invades the privacy of every American who owns even one
livestock animal, whether a horse, pet pot-bellied pig, chicken, cow,
goat, sheep, etc.
3. NAIS will not protect us against disease or bioterrorism because
(a) it does not address the causes of disease; (b) it does not address
how diseases are transmitted; (c) we already have sufficient means of
tracking diseases and controlling outbreaks; and (d) the recommended
technology (ISO radio tags) can be easily reprogrammed, so that it is
ineffective against intentional introductions of disease.
4. NAIS will greatly expand the government bureaucracy, at the cost of
individuals' rights and the free market.
5. NAIS will raise the cost of food, while not providing any
additional food safety.
6. NAIS has been developed by the USDA without Congressional hearings
or debate, and without any real involvement of the tens of thousands
of individuals who will be affected.
Hi
Everyone … looking for horse people from
7:30
pm
Grange
Hall

The USDA plans to make every owner of even one horse, cow, pig, goat, sheep, chicken, or pigeon register in a government database and subject their property and animals to constant federal and state government surveillance, and the animal owner will have to PAY for the privilege of owning animals!
"But
ask the animals, and they will teach you; the birds of the air, and
they will tell you; ask the plants of the earth, and they will teach
you; and the fish of the sea will declare to you. Who among all these
does not know that the hand of the Creator of Life has done this? In
God's hand is the life of every living thing and the breath of every
human being." -- Job 12:7-10
"Men try to
fix problems with duct tape. God did it with nails."
-- Anonymous, John 3:16
Learn
to accept
Your Blessings so you can Bless others.
Learn
to accept
YOURSELF so you can help others.
Accept
JESUS as your Lord and Savior so you can lead others to HOPE.
DEFINITION FOR "PENZANCE": God's Holy Headland; A Place for Spiritual Growth.
|
|
![]() |